synthesized audio

General help on the Wiki

Moderators: kcleung, Wiki Admins

Post Reply
nepsus
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 6:08 am
notabot: 42
notabot2: Human

synthesized audio

Post by nepsus »

Hello. I've noticed there's a sort of "quality exception" for the policy against synthesized
audio, so I wanted to know if this recording and others similarly created would be eligible
to upload as recordings:

http://www.suspenlute.com/nepsus/Chris% ... riccio.mp3

Thanks for your attention
pjones235
active poster
Posts: 134
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 9:36 pm
notabot: 42
notabot2: Human
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States of America
Contact:

Re: synthesized audio

Post by pjones235 »

Which software was used?
nepsus
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 6:08 am
notabot: 42
notabot2: Human

Re: synthesized audio

Post by nepsus »

FL Studio and GPO. I'm also using SIR for convolution but I can't remember if I had it for that recording
lekro
regular poster
Posts: 39
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 6:26 pm
notabot: 42
notabot2: Human

Re: synthesized audio

Post by lekro »

Hi. I'm wondering if this synthesized MP3 would pass as "high quality" piano.
http://ulinks.webs.com/clementi-op37-no2-mvt1.mp3

~Lekro
Hamstray
regular poster
Posts: 26
Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 6:50 pm
notabot: 42
notabot2: Human
Contact:

Re: synthesized audio

Post by Hamstray »

lekro wrote:Hi. I'm wondering if this synthesized MP3 would pass as "high quality" piano.
i don't think so
lekro
regular poster
Posts: 39
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 6:26 pm
notabot: 42
notabot2: Human

Re: synthesized audio

Post by lekro »

Hamstray wrote:
lekro wrote:Hi. I'm wondering if this synthesized MP3 would pass as "high quality" piano.
i don't think so
What is really meant by "high quality"? Do I need more dynamics?
pjones235
active poster
Posts: 134
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 9:36 pm
notabot: 42
notabot2: Human
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States of America
Contact:

Re: synthesized audio

Post by pjones235 »

lekro
regular poster
Posts: 39
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 6:26 pm
notabot: 42
notabot2: Human

Re: synthesized audio

Post by lekro »

Thanks. Now I understand.
pjones235
active poster
Posts: 134
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 9:36 pm
notabot: 42
notabot2: Human
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States of America
Contact:

Re: synthesized audio

Post by pjones235 »

No problem
KGill
Copyright Reviewer
Posts: 1295
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 10:16 pm
notabot: 42
notabot2: Human

Re: synthesized audio

Post by KGill »

At this point, the 'quality exception' is looking kind of useless/weird because we allow MIDI files, and we're also getting some MP3 realizations of MIDI from WIMA. Is there any reason to discriminate? Maybe we should just remove the quality exception and rewrite the policy to allow all synthesized audio. We've gone this far...
Carolus
Site Admin
Posts: 2249
Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 11:18 pm
notabot: 42
notabot2: Human
Contact:

Re: synthesized audio

Post by Carolus »

Yes, the "quality exception" really became obsolete when the "Synthesized/MIDI" tab came into play. BTW, just so anyone reading this will know, all items which are artificially generated by computer should go under this tab, regardless of the audio file format. There are probably at least as many MP3s on the site which have been generated from MIDIs as there are actual MIDIs at this point. All should go under the "Synthesized/MIDI" tab. The other tabs should be reserved for recorded performances or audios created by putting together different tracks of recorded performances.
Post Reply