Handel, Quel fior HWV 192 vs 200

Any posts related to the categorization and standardization of IMSLP

Moderators: perlnerd666, Davydov

Handel, Quel fior HWV 192 vs 200

Postby steltz » Sun Jun 24, 2012 8:50 am

This page:

http://imslp.org/wiki/Quel_fior_all%27a ... e_Frideric)

may have a wrong HWV number. Grove Music lists 4 versions of this, each with its own HWV number. They say that HWV 192 was 2 sopranos only, and that HWV 200 was the version for 2 sopranos and continuo. (There is also a solo cantata HWV 154 and then a version with a slightly different text which doesn't seem to have an HWV number).

However, this specific page, since it has continuo, would seem to be HWV 200. It's a typeset, with no source listed.

Should I just move it?

(I'm holding off tagging it until this is resolved.)
bsteltz
steltz
active poster
 
Posts: 1506
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 2:30 pm

Re: Handel, Quel fior HWV 192 vs 200

Postby Notenschreiber » Sun Jun 24, 2012 6:10 pm

The title page with HWV 192 is correct. HWV 200 is a terzett (for 2 sopranos and a bass voice), whereas HWV 192 is a duett for sopranos,
both works with continuo. compare http://www.klassika.info/Komponisten/Ha ... index.html and
http://www.klassika.info/Komponisten/Ha ... index.html
Notenschreiber
active poster
 
Posts: 361
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 12:31 pm

Re: Handel, Quel fior HWV 192 vs 200

Postby Notenschreiber » Wed Jun 27, 2012 9:19 pm

One can find the composition here too: http://imslp.org/wiki/Duos_and_Trios,_2 ... rideric%29 , No.16.
Additional remark:
This page is marked for cleanup because the files should be split into their constituent pieces and moved to individual work pages/HWV numbers — P.davydov 08:51, 29 August 2010 (UTC).
Notenschreiber
active poster
 
Posts: 361
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 12:31 pm

Re: Handel, Quel fior HWV 192 vs 200

Postby steltz » Wed Jun 27, 2012 9:54 pm

Sorry I haven't had a chance to get back to this, but I'm dealing with another problem right now. Do you have any idea why Grove would list the 192 as being without continuo?
bsteltz
steltz
active poster
 
Posts: 1506
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 2:30 pm

Re: Handel, Quel fior HWV 192 vs 200

Postby Notenschreiber » Thu Jun 28, 2012 5:56 am

I don't know the exact quote of Grove, probably the work is listed under "Italian arias" with the addition (SS), whereas HWV 200 is also an italian aria with (SSB). So we have two voices in HWV 192 and three voices in HWV 200. The continuo part is not mentioned, because the notion "italian aria" includes a continuo part. A hint to the autograph can be found in RISM. Type HWV 192 in the search window and refine to "Duette".
Notenschreiber
active poster
 
Posts: 361
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 12:31 pm

Re: Handel, Quel fior HWV 192 vs 200

Postby Notenschreiber » Mon Jul 02, 2012 6:06 am

I would think, you can go ahead and tag the workpage HWV 192. Everything has been cleared up.
Notenschreiber
active poster
 
Posts: 361
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 12:31 pm

Re: Handel, Quel fior HWV 192 vs 200

Postby steltz » Mon Jul 02, 2012 8:16 am

I will definitely deal with this soon, I've just been dealing with a few other things. Thanks.
bsteltz
steltz
active poster
 
Posts: 1506
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 2:30 pm

Re: Handel, Quel fior HWV 192 vs 200

Postby Notenschreiber » Thu Jul 19, 2012 8:29 am

May I remind you to tag the Handel page?
Notenschreiber
active poster
 
Posts: 361
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 12:31 pm


Return to Categorization / Standardization

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest