Renaissance score site

Moderators: Vivaldi, kcleung

Renaissance score site

Postby ras1 » Tue Jul 01, 2008 6:52 pm

http://www.upv.es/coro/victoria/mas_partituras.html

This site has many choral works of leading Spanish Renaissance composers, mostly Victoria, Morales, and Guerrero. There's basically no copyright information given, so I can't tell for sure if they're all PD. It doesn't help that I don't speak Spanish. Help?
ras1
active poster
 
Posts: 162
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 8:28 pm

Postby Yagan Kiely » Wed Jul 02, 2008 6:06 am

They are all lilypond typesets, and this is what he has said (in Spanish translated with google)

Yes, you can use and distribute free of charge, wherever non-profit basis. That is, if you go to print these scores to sell, you must contact me before.

[quote]Unless stated otherwise, I have based editing Felipe Pedrell made in Leipzig in the early twentieth century.[/quote[
Yagan Kiely
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1138
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 8:16 am
Location: Perth, Australia

Postby Sanfior » Thu Oct 23, 2008 1:24 pm

As far as no copyright marks are given, I think this typeset copies are not copyrighted, and music is old, so might be in public domain.
Sincerely,
Sanfior.
Sanfior
regular poster
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 12:57 pm
Location: Belarus

Postby pml » Sat Oct 25, 2008 1:09 am

First. Almost all of Victoria's works were published by the composer in his own lifetime (there are only about a dozen, extremely minor works not in this category). Thus there are no copyright issues regarding the date of first publication as the composer died in 1611. (Victoria is fairly unusual in a Renaissance context, to have had virtually 99% of his music published in the course of his life.)

Second. Pedrell's edition of the Victoria works is very close to an urtext, irrespective of the facts that Pedrell died in 1922, none of it was issued posthumously, and thus any creative work on his part (which I am not convinced is apparent) would no longer qualify for any residual editorial copyright.

The volumes are thus in the public domain. However Nancho Alvarez's typesets may be eligible for a typographical copyright in some jurisdictions, and as the copyright tagging system doesn't allow a mixture of PD and non-PD tags, it would be actually more accurate to mark them V*/V*/V* (PD, urtext) rather than !N/!N/!N (non-PD, permission granted).

Regards, Philip
pml
Copyright Reviewer
 
Posts: 564
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 3:42 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia


Return to Other

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest