Fair enough. I too also consider his 10th his better Symphony.Agreed, but in his symphonies at least, even the quiet, transparent passages tend to be rather blunt. IMO, his song cycles are his best works because they don't have that trait so much. (Actually, I feel that his Tenth doesn't too much either, which is why I consider it the best of his symphonies.)
It's a common term for Digital Natives to separate the unseparable. I mean people I have physical contact with.When you were describing people who complain about Mahler in "real life", Yagan Kiely, were you implying that this forum is fake?
Would class authorities would back up any arguments (which this thread has few of anyway), with Aesthetics and as many musical insights as possible.I feel that it was implied that this entire thread was in one's opinion because even a world-class authority is only a respectable opinion.
I'll retract the statement. If everyone followed my criteria Beethoven would certainly be overrated but they don't so he isn't. Beethoven's 'good' pieces are possibly the best music in existence, but he did compose quite a few (understandably) lesser known and, to be honest, bad pieces of music (Wellington's Victory for example)And you yourself said that Beethoven was overrated, adding 'IMHO'.
I meant that (if anyone) he should be judged by those who do not have intimate ties to him (his fans). There are no such fans at my uni, but he is still one of the most popular orchestral composer.Well, the supporters are the ones rating him/her, so 'overrated' could just mean that there's too much jingoism surrounding the music of that composer.
No no! I'm not saying you are fallacious, I'm saying that the argument (in it's current form) that either Brahms or Mahler are overrated is fallacious – not you.So the only real difference in what we have said in that particular area (besides the wording of the reasons) was the tone of the response, which in your case was reasonable and in my case was raging. However, if I did have reasons that were in and of themselves halfway reasonable, then there's not much reason to call me (or anyone else who gave reasons) fallacious, especially since you replied with your opinions as well.
Those three A's don't even half resolve though!Could Brahm's friend, Herr tickle88, be thinking of the finale of Mozart's 41st Symphony? The main theme is, of course, begins C D F E A A A.
allegroamabile wrote:The other thing about Mahler is his ensemble choice is very limited (symphonies, leiders, couple of chamber works). No concertos!
Yagan Kiely wrote:Many of the 'Opera' composers rarely compose anything but operas. That said, I read somewhere that Mahler was planning to write some operas… but he died (the opposite I remember to have read being the case for Wagner).
Yagan Kiely wrote:Many of the 'Opera' composers rarely compose anything but operas. That said, I read somewhere that Mahler was planning to write some operas... but he died (the opposite I remember to have read being the case for Wagner).
allegroamabile wrote:The Reformation Symphony has really cool and neat dotted eighths and sixteenth note-like figures in the first movement.
Deinonychus wrote:On the subject of Mahler, I enjoy all his symphonies, some more than others, but I for me the greatest is No. 7, which hasn't really been mentioned so far
allegroamabile wrote:there are some Mahler out there which I really do enjoy, for instance his Symphony No. 1 and the terrific and engaging opening of the last movement in his Seventh Symphony.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest