New recordings of PD music in different countries

General copyright-related issues and discussions

Moderator: Copyright Reviewers

Post Reply
musicnerd
regular poster
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 4:42 pm

New recordings of PD music in different countries

Post by musicnerd »

- Stravinsky's Symphony No.1 is PD in the US but not in Canada/EU. If it were to be recorded in a different country but distributed only in the US, would the orchestra need a license from the publisher or would it enjoy the PD status?

- If a publisher sells a piece that can be used in performances (such as Prokofiev's Piano Sonata No.5, PD in Canada but not in US/EU), can it still be recorded or does it require permission/license to do so?
Carolus
Site Admin
Posts: 2249
Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 11:18 pm
notabot: 42
notabot2: Human
Contact:

Re: New recordings of PD music in different countries

Post by Carolus »

That is a fairly complicated issue. I expect much depends upon the copyright law of the country where the actual recording is taking place. I expect the way it works in practice is that the recording organization pays a rental fee for the material in the locale where the work is still under copyright - including a fee for the session itself. Once the item is recorded, nothing would be owed provided distribution was limited to territories where the work was public domain (Stravinsky's Symphony in E-flat major being a very good example). Often, items like this are distributed worldwide, so the usual royalties are paid anyway.
musicnerd
regular poster
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 4:42 pm

Re: New recordings of PD music in different countries

Post by musicnerd »

So if the piece is not PD, but the sheet music is readily available (publishers often sell Piano Sonatas but put orchestral material for hire), you still need to pay a rental fee, and a session fee to record it?
Carolus
Site Admin
Posts: 2249
Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 11:18 pm
notabot: 42
notabot2: Human
Contact:

Re: New recordings of PD music in different countries

Post by Carolus »

Yes, that's basically it. If the work is under copyright in the place where it is being recorded, the copyright owner or their agents can charge a fee for the recording session itself - even if it's for a piano work which is normally sold. This is different than the so-called 'mechanical license', which pertains to a royalty being paid upon copies of the recording sold in a territory where a work is under copyright.
Post Reply