Users by Instrument: treble viola da gamba?

Moderators: kcleung, Wiki Admins

Post Reply
Mostad
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 2:40 am
notabot: 42
notabot2: Human
Contact:

Users by Instrument: treble viola da gamba?

Post by Mostad »

I recentely started playing the treble viol. I didn't find a general Violist [da gamba] category or a more specific Treble violists catergory. How do I create a category? I read the page where it said I should make a new page under "Category:User XXXists", but I don't know how to do this...

(I am supposing the category violists means violists [da braccio], allthough there is no disambiguation to be found. :D )
KGill
Copyright Reviewer
Posts: 1295
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 10:16 pm
notabot: 42
notabot2: Human

Re: Users by Instrument: treble viola da gamba?

Post by KGill »

After some investigation, it turns out someone else created part of a system for viola da gamba, but didn't complete it (this is why you couldn't find it in the list). I have now fixed it, so the templates User vdg-1 etc. should now work properly :)
Mostad
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 2:40 am
notabot: 42
notabot2: Human
Contact:

Re: Users by Instrument: treble viola da gamba?

Post by Mostad »

Perfect! :-) Not that it is such a big deal anyway, but it is sort of fun.
Miwarre
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 6:16 pm
notabot: 42
notabot2: Human

Re: Users by Instrument: treble viola da gamba?

Post by Miwarre »

A small request:

I am not an English native speaker, but "viola da gambist" sounds odd to me.

Is it possible to change it into "viola da gamba player"? (as in "shakuhachi player", "recorder player", "mellophone player" and "handbell ringer").

Thaks,

M.
pml
Copyright Reviewer
Posts: 1219
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 3:42 am
notabot: 42
notabot2: Human
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Users by Instrument: treble viola da gamba?

Post by pml »

I am a native English speaker, and actually gambist is the correct word – like flautist, or oboist.

Regards, PML
--
PML (talk)
Miwarre
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 6:16 pm
notabot: 42
notabot2: Human

Re: Users by Instrument: treble viola da gamba?

Post by Miwarre »

Of course, I trust you, as this is your language and not mine. But "gambist" or "viola da gambist"?

Thanks,

M.
pml
Copyright Reviewer
Posts: 1219
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 3:42 am
notabot: 42
notabot2: Human
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Users by Instrument: treble viola da gamba?

Post by pml »

"Viola da gambist" is certainly clumsier than “gambist”, but I know a friend who plays the gamba refers to herself as a player using either term, so I think the only reason for citing the first would be for the sake of clarity, since the original term “violist” has been appropriated for players of the common orchestral viola (some dictionaries will state that a “violist” can refer to a player of either the viola or the viol, which is viewed as unhelpfully ambiguous).

For example, “violoncello” and “cello” are interchangeable, but “violoncellist” is a clumsier term than “cellist” – you’d only use “violoncellist” if you really wanted to spell it out for someone, or deliberately wanted to use the fancier term. The viola da gamba is considerably more obscure nowadays than either the viola or the cello, so that there is a case for using the clumsier of the terms, “viola da gambist”, to dispel any possible ambiguity or confusion.

Regards, PML
--
PML (talk)
Lyle Neff
active poster
Posts: 702
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 3:21 pm
notabot: 42
notabot2: Human
Location: Delaware, USA
Contact:

Re: Users by Instrument: treble viola da gamba?

Post by Lyle Neff »

I'd prefer "violist da gamba," but I'm weird that way. :mrgreen:
"A libretto, a libretto, my kingdom for a libretto!" -- Cesar Cui (letter to Stasov, Feb. 20, 1877)
Deinonychus
regular poster
Posts: 43
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 6:22 pm
notabot: YES
notabot2: Bot
Location: UK

Re: Users by Instrument: treble viola da gamba?

Post by Deinonychus »

I'm with Lyle (but didn't want to say anything earlier in case I drew attention to my weirdness)
pml
Copyright Reviewer
Posts: 1219
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 3:42 am
notabot: 42
notabot2: Human
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Users by Instrument: treble viola da gamba?

Post by pml »

It’s quite possible my friend the gambist is the weird one! I note it’s not in the dictionary so it might be a neologism, but vernacular words often are.

PML
--
PML (talk)
Miwarre
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 6:16 pm
notabot: 42
notabot2: Human

Re: Users by Instrument: treble viola da gamba?

Post by Miwarre »

When I posted the original request, I suspected I was opening a can of worms; I (kind of) apologize.

Just to add to the confusion:
pml wrote:For example, “violoncello” and “cello” are interchangeable, but “violoncellist” is a clumsier term than “cellist” – you’d only use “violoncellist” if you really wanted to spell it out for someone, or deliberately wanted to use the fancier term. The viola da gamba is considerably more obscure nowadays than either the viola or the cello, so that there is a case for using the clumsier of the terms, “viola da gambist”, to dispel any possible ambiguity or confusion.
Of course, the whole thread is about English, so this is very aside. However, I cannot resist bringing in the facts that "violoncello", as well as "viola da gamba", are Italian terms, that in Italian "cello" and "cellista" do not exist ("cello" is very rarely used by English influence), and that "viola da gambista" -- if it existed -- would sounds more like a joke than a qualification: "violista" is often used, ignoring the ambiguity with a viola (alto/bratsche) player; "gambista" is also used to avoid this very ambiguity. This may accounts for my resistance to accept the English "viola da gambist" over "gambist" or even over "viola da gamba player".

I'm making no point here, simply adding some knowledge elements. Thanks for reading!

M.

(Just to avoid misunderstanding: my knowledge of Italian relies on me being Italian and native Italian speaker...)
Post Reply